24th September 2013

Time to join the campaign

With RDR now behind us, PFS chief executive Keith Richards is looking ahead with a campaign to build trust in the financial planning profession. Discover how you can back the initiative…

By now, pretty much everyone working in financial services has probably become tired of hearing those three little letters – RDR (retail distribution review). However, whether you embraced it from the start or begrudgingly complied with its requirements, its implementation does present us with a real opportunity to change consumer perceptions, building awareness and trust in the profession as a whole.

This positive opportunity to raise awareness of the commitment and hard work of all who achieved their Level 4 qualifications (or higher) should not be overlooked. It is an incredible achievement for an entire market to move to a higher standard in a relatively short space of time. Importantly, this achievement, coupled with a significant regulatory and market development, presents us with a tangible opportunity to establish recognition and improve confidence in the financial planning profession and promote its inherent consumer benefits. 

Let me be clear – I am proposing an opportunity for the sector as a whole to gain greater recognition for being a profession. The vast majority of individual clients, of course, already trust their adviser to act in their best interests and provide them with a professional and valued service. However, those same clients generally have little trust in other advisers or the profession in general. Consumer research provides evidence that retail financial services are viewed with suspicion and a lack of trust, which is something we need to change.

Unintended consequences

I am always amazed at just how critical advisers can be of each other, whether it is about different charging models, independence versus restricted or simply a hunch that adviser poor practice is still rife. Some advisers are also happy to go public in deriding their peers on anecdotal evidence of churning, mis-selling or other misdemeanours, with few able to offer any actual evidence. You would rarely hear a legal adviser accepting that wrongdoing existed to any relevant extent within their profession; indeed, a lawyer would instinctively defend their profession against criticism to avoid all lawyers unintentionally being tarred with the same brush.

It is important to recognise the unintended consequence of public criticism as contributing to the erosion of confidence and trust in the entire profession. And it is not just consumer perceptions that are impacted – the regulator and other professions are also looking inward. I am certainly not advocating that anyone should turn a blind eye to wrongdoing or sweep it under the carpet; that would equally do little for building  confidence in our profession. If I personally came across evidence of poor practice, I would know how to professionally deal with it to protect consumers and the profession in general. I am, however, highlighting that we need to understand the consequences of washing our dirty laundry in public, especially without evidence. If anyone comes across evidence, they should report it, not blog or Tweet about it. I am also not suggesting that advisers should be gagged from having a view, or should not use social media or trade blogs to air their respective opinions. I respect those who do so under their real name and want to add constructive comment or debate, but I disagree with the number of negative, especially anonymous and sometimes slanderous, bloggers, who simply bring the profession into disrepute without accountability, responsibility, or due consideration of others. If people want to make their views public, that is of course their right, but they should at least have the backbone to put their real name to it, rather than writing under anonymous or a pseudonym. 

It is time for the silent majority to unite and more positively influence the future of our profession.

It is high time the industry put aside its differences and made consumers aware of the higher standards of  professionalism that the RDR has achieved. We need to unify and get our own house in order – demonstrating confidence and respect in our own profession will ultimately influence external audiences looking in. The potential benefits are immense:

  • More positive trade press – national consumer press scan the trade press, blogs and social media sites;
  • Better engagement with the regulator – a change in behaviour will help influence the Financial Conduct Authority;
  • Potential regulatory recognition, which could lead to a less intrusive supervisory oversight;
  • Greater recognition and referrals from other professions and consumer bodies;
  • More graduates and new entrants attracted to the profession; A professional image, which will secure higher consumer confidence and trust. 

Playing your part

So, what should you do to support the Consumer Confidence Campaign and help achieve these objectives?

  • Have pride in our profession – Talk positively about the profession. Every adviser has a long list of clients that have benefited from their advisory services, so the fact that the RDR has now introduced higher standards and greater transparency is a hugely positive message.
  • Accept that difference is not necessarily bad or wrong – Our market can accommodate a wide variety of business models, all of which have the potential to appropriately meet a client need. Some clients want an online transactional service, while others may see merit in a more holistic lifestyle approach. Concentrate on perfecting your own advice offering rather than commenting on others.
  • Join together in a united voice – The regulator sees small advisory firms behaving in a fragmented and disparate manner, which no doubt influences its supervisory focus. By coming together to positively support our profession, we have the opportunity to change perceptions and regulatory outcomes.
  • Tell clients about your PFS membership and commitment to professionalism – Similar to the way the legal profession espouses membership of the Law Society. The adherence to a code of professional ethics is important and reassuring to consumers, as is your commitment to continually updating your knowledge and skills through continuing professional development.

Campaign logo – Go to the campaign website at www.thepfs.org/confidenceand register your support. You can also download and display the campaign logo to demonstrate to your peers that you are committed to working together to achieve the desired outcomes and encourage wider support. You can see that the campaign logo is brand neutral so that even political differences can be put aside in the pursuit of desired outcomes.

Greater opportunities for all

Our ultimate ambition must be to create a more vibrant financial planning sector that is well thought of and highly trusted. More consumers will seek professional financial advice and be confident in paying for the expertise of a highly qualified and ethical adviser. Good consumer outcomes will be positively perceived by all stakeholders and result in a reinvigorated sector, offering opportunities for all.

 

Keith Richards, CEO, Personal Finance Society

Remember to go to the campaign website at www.thepfs.org/confidence and register your support

RDR

Registration

Free Registration and CPD

Related Articles_

Square Mile Research: Talking opportunities and finding your edge


“One of the great things about fund management is things – companies, market structure, views on value and growth – are always changing. And as fund managers we are always learning.” Read the latest interview in Square Mile’s series with Neil Veitch, Global Investment Director at SVM Asset Management.

Read More

Time to do something about the FSCS levy


Some members have seen their FCA invoices rise by 80%. This and the cost of PI is compromising the very future of advice.

Read More

Faith Liversedge: The suit is dead. Long live the suit


Even if we’re shirted from the waist up while on our Zoom calls, we’re more than likely to be stretchy panted down below.

Read More

Comments (4)

Oh goodness Mr Richards banging this worn out old drum again.

From his own mouth he confirms what perhaps many of us believe:
The vast majority of individual clients, of course, already trust their adviser to act in their best interests and provide them with a professional and valued service. However, those same clients generally have little trust in other advisers.

So why should we care if out clients dont think much of other advisers and Financial Services in general?

Indeed they are probably quite right. There are still many outfits around that shall we say as not as client centric as they may be. As advisers we daily see the rubbish and numpties we have to deal with. Indeed we have in general pretty little faith in those big firms and providers with whom we have to do business. A daily litany of abysmal service, errors, ignorance and offshore call centres. Yes there are honourable exceptions but too few. In the main it is the long established household named firms that let all of us down.

Perhaps thats where Mr Richards needs to start. The IFA sector has shown itself to be pretty resilient in the face of ever present difficulties and irritations.

I think he overlooks the fact that one of our titles is Intermediary. We intermediate for the client and steer them through the unfriendly labyrinth that is Financial Services. (And I dont only mean products) Many of us are valued and appreciated for that alone.

Harry Katz   04/10/2013   09:25
This all seemed good stuff until we got to the end an it suddenly seemed like a free ad for Keith's own organisation.

That said, I do think advisers need to think very carefully about their offering.

If you want to be treated as a professional, act like a professional. Ask a solicitor for a copy of their client agreement and see what you can borrow for yours.

Remember, too, before criticising others that you probably only have one side of the story - the client's. If they are slagging off their previous adviser is the grievance genuine or are you acquiring somebody else's trouble?

Peter Turner   04/10/2013   10:45
You may find this link, it was how Keith got in touch.

The firm in question makes this "why we are different" observation: We tell you the truth about your money whereas we believe that the majority of Financial Advisers dont. Its not that they lie; they simply dont tell the whole truth because they have to look after their interests as well as yours.

http://www.panaceaadviser.com/main/st8663/Don%92t+knock+it+till+you+try+it.htm

Not helpful.

Derek Bradley   04/10/2013   11:40
Yes Derek .Perhaps not helpful and perhaps indelicately put but regrettably more than a grain of truth in it. Thats not to say that the firm who has this on their website is whiter than white (I doubt it) or that I necessarily agree with this sort of action. However the truth is the truth.

One of the biggest impediments to client trust is in fact the Regulator who harps on incessantly about the miscreants and the wonderful fines (or tax) that it imposes without one scintilla of praise or information concerning the majority of firms who do a good job. Perhaps that should be Mr Richards second port of call.

Harry Katz   07/10/2013   16:00

Login

Not yet registered?

Please complete this form to join our community

Name
Email
Company
Select your role:
Password
Confirm Password