15th November 2016

Brexit, Trump. Pragmatism next?

A definition of Public opinion is “an expression of the general population's thoughts on a particular political issue”.

Certain sections of the metropolitan elite are still in denial about Brexit and our virus is about to hit the USA. A reversal of the theory that when America sneezes, we get the flu.

It is a strange thing that those who wear the right to free speech and democracy so loudly and proudly on their sleeves seem to want to keep railing against a democratically determined result because it does not fit with their ideals. In fact anyone who successfully voted contra to their view, in the UK for ‘Brexit’ and in the USA for Trump, must be an idiot that is in need of ‘re-programming’. 

The ‘Trump’ victory has been a shock to many and it seems that the outcome was determined by the failings of the ‘Clinton’ camp and pollsters to understand that the democratic process has become so distorted by those who express opinions that simply echo the controlling elites ‘thinking’ of what was right. Quite ‘Orwellian’ in fact. 

Many who voted in the Brexit and now Trump democratic process no longer wish to be seen expressing their views or intent as to do so attracts abuse- physical in some cases and certainly with social media trolling.

I am reminded of a great observation on the Spanish dealings with the Brit expats in the Costa del Sol when I lived there. It was said that the Spanish would tell you what you want to hear rather than what you need to hear. 

In this case Trump got to hear what he needed to know to win, Clinton got to listen to what she wanted to hear to lose. 

So in reality the voter outcome of Brexit and the US election have a common bond and that is the silent majority.

I think that the so called losing side in these democratic processes both in the UK and US needs to take a good long look at themselves.

Because those who may have a contra view of your world vision are not idiots, racists, anti-semites, hate crime driven, LGBT phobic monsters. Quite the contrary in fact, they may have a view that just could turn out to be right given time and reflection. 

Just a thought.

Panacea Comment

Registration

Free Registration and CPD

Related Articles_

The Golden Rule of AI for Financial Advisers: Protect Your Client Data


Artificial intelligence has the potential to transform the way advice firms work, helping to reduce administration, improve efficiency and free up more time for clients. But before embracing AI, there is one principle that should never be overlooked

Read More

Getting Better Results from AI: The RTCC Framework


Artificial intelligence is only as good as the instructions you give it. If you’ve ever asked AI a question and received an answer that felt generic, vague or simply not quite right, don’t be too quick to blame the technology.

Read More

Beyond the Hype: The Four Pillars of AI Assistance for Financial Advisers


Artificial intelligence has quickly become one of the biggest talking points in financial services. But once you look beyond the headlines, many advisers are left asking the same question: “What would I actually use it for?” If your only experience of AI has been asking it to write the occasional email, you’re only scratching the surface.

Read More

Comments (2)

Great observations and conclusions within the article, thanks for artiiculating what I think & feel.

The only thing I could add is their failure to accept the BREXIT democratic vote decision highlights their argumentative skills which is to drown out the opposition & to shout louder than their opponent to hide their own ignorance!

David Hatton   23/11/2016   21:57
We live in an age when the so called liberal elite, in many ways a small but very powerful influencer, has got away with telling the populace what to think, how to think, when to think.

I alluded to George Orwells 'Animal Farm' and that is what we have today in so many ways.

The decision of an electorate may not always prove to be correct and that is democracy at work. It was Joseph de Maistre who wrote in 1811 "Every nation gets the government it deserves."

Perhaps the decisions in the US and UK will see (in 'regu-speak' language) positive outcomes but whatever happens both countries need to develop thicker skins in so many ways, accepting that society is not always fair, that minorities should not assume majority entitlement rights and as per Donald Trump's inspired choice of victory song, recognise that :

"You can't always get what you want. But if you try sometimes, well you just might find, you get what you need".

Derek Bradley   24/11/2016   09:06

Login

Not yet registered?

Please complete this form to join our community

Name
Email
Company
Select your role:
Password
Confirm Password